In low-income people and SMEs are most unreasonable accused of ...

????????

less tax?

?Forbes said the tax burden on the world?s second China?, ?China?s fiscal revenue to more than 10 trillion yuan,? China?s tax burden is the old topic, never lack followers. We are ?wealthy and poor? do? Heavy tax burden it? Tax it?

scholar called ?the country is not rich, not poor people?

Ministry of Finance recently released data show that the first eight months of the national fiscal revenue 7.428629 trillion yuan, up 30.9%. Thus estimated revenue this year will exceed 10 trillion. While the corresponding, most residents feel that their income has not increased significantly.

a lot of people worry about China?s rapid revenue growth, or inhibit the enthusiasm of residents and businesses and lead to ?wealthy and poor.?

?The Wealth of Nations? do?

Ministry of Finance Branch, deputy director of the dynasty was to ?China Economic Weekly? analysis that adjusted GDP last year to 40 trillion, this year is 45 trillion GDP, fiscal revenue accounted for only 10 trillion GDP
20% more; and negative more than 20 trillion debt. If the income of the land and the like to remove, do not high.

?poor people? do?

?people are poor not to mention, can only say that the proportion of national income distribution is slightly smaller.? dynasty was said.

have the same view with the dynasty was also the State Department counselor, vice president of the Central University of Finance and Taxation Liu Huan, he accepted the ?China Economic Weekly? interview, decisively, said: ?Basically, this argument wealthy and poor countries should be ruled out . ?

Liu Huan came to this judge on the basis that the reform of China?s current budget to do the restructuring, more and more tilted to the livelihood of the people, revenue for the proportion of people living expenses is much higher than in the past.

According to the Ministry of Finance data showed last year, the country?s financial life for the people directly related with the education, health care, social security and other spending nearly 3 trillion yuan, an increase of 21.1%, total expenditures accounted for people?s livelihood two-thirds of the national fiscal expenditure.

?Overall, the production of constructive financial livelihood of public finances towards conversion, the intensity is still very substantial.? Liu Huan said.

who felt most unreasonable tax burden?

for Forbes? tax misery index the world?s second China, ?saying,? People?s Daily ?issued a document to be denied that, saying that China?s macro tax burden low. Forbes? tax misery index ?to corporate income tax, personal income tax, individuals, businesses pay social insurance fees, VAT, taxes, property taxes six simple sum algorithm, poor science and does not reflect the true situation. The reason is that there are several flaws in this calculation method, including the nominal tax rate is not equal to the effective tax rate, the highest marginal tax rate applicable to such a small range. Also cited the ?China Statistical Yearbook 2010? and other multi-data, and interviewed experts pointed out that by international standards, ?tax burden? measure, China?s tax burden is not high.

this, Forbes once again responded, ?Tax Misery Index? is not aimed at China. Varies between countries, are more likely to choose common deficiencies, but can not say unscientific. Tax Misery Index is the most significant, is to provide an international comparison of reference, and compared with other developing countries, China?s tax burden is high.

but the ?People?s Daily? and Forbes has reached a common conclusion: the low-income and the tax burden on the current level of most SMEs are unreasonable.

discipline in Hubei province, deputy head of the Department of Finance to monitor the director Fu Guangming view, the purpose of State and Government in power, is to achieve the prosperity of all people, so that more revenue for livelihood projects for people benefit but simply. China?s fiscal revenue in the current case of rapid growth, tax cuts imperative.

structural tax cut is the direction

tax cuts as the main form of tax reform in China began in 2004, when Premier Wen Jiabao?s ?Government Work Report? in the three mentioned tax reform. In recent years, ?structural tax cuts? have become the main form of tax reform in China.

?structural tax? is first proposed, in early December 2008 Central Economic Work Conference. The so-called structural tax is ?increases and decreases, structural adjustment? of a tax reform program is to achieve specific goals for specific groups, specific tax to reduce tax burden.

Liu Huan, ?China Economic Weekly,? said the central government clearly put forward that ?five? to implement ?structural tax cuts.? Structural tax cuts mean two things: First, our overall tax burden should fall, let the companies have a more relaxed business environment and conditions; Second, the tax adjustment is the tax increases and decreases. By, for example, and the people closely related to the VAT, should further reduce the space and room. Increasing, such as environmental protection, to curb high energy consumption and high pollution industries, to take resolute measures to impose its high taxes on pollution, environmental damage caused to compensate.

Jia Kang, director of the Institute of Fiscal Science, also pointed out the need for structural tax cuts, ?For small businesses, corporate innovation activities but also to give tax incentives to try to tax cuts; but we must have a structural tax increase The most typical one is the resource tax; In addition, there are also specific tax increases and decreases. ?

guests

Dynasty before

Ministry of Finance Branch, deputy director of the

Liu Huan

State Department counselor,

vice president of the Central University of Finance and Taxation

EQUAL

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences researcher Finance and Trade

Fu Guangming

deputy director of Hubei Provincial Department of Finance discipline inspection, supervision, director

China?s tax burden in the end weight is not heavy?

heavier

Fu Guangming: China?s tax burden is quite heavy, especially in the turnover tax is a relatively heavy tax is not heavy, but lax tax collection and management of this one. China?s main source of revenue is value-added tax, sales tax, turnover tax aspects of these may duplicate the phenomenon of charge.

Mainland China Forbes said, ?Tax Misery Index? the world?s second, I do not agree with this view. Because of China?s nominal and real tax revenue has a big gap between China?s current nominal tax is high, in fact not as high as they say, if special emphasis on China?s economy will not be the rapid development of the business will collapse , the fact that China?s tax burden is basically reasonable.

not say

Liu Huan: heavy and not heavy is a relative term. If most of the country?s tax return to the residents, this is not important; if most did not return to the tax residents who, even then a small proportion, and I think that is very heavy. So heavy and not heavy, the first refers to the absolute number of tax; the second is the tax share of GDP, and GDP growth rate also compared; the third is the ratio of tax revenue returned to taxpayers how much. Comprehensive analysis of these three factors, in order to say that weight is not heavy.

ratio Gaobu Gao, see what caliber of macro tax burden. If only the income of the national budget, it is not high, if the Chinese characteristics, including Canada, such as social security payments, etc. included, it can not be considered low; if the return figures for comparison, there are still many non- desired.

Forbes mere six

now the highest tax rate the simple addition of this algorithm is probably not stand scrutiny.

EQUAL: see how look at this problem. Important to say, just looking for a country comparison, some heavy; however, and some Scandinavian countries, nor heavy. This matter of opinion. Tax revenue to GDP
5% or 10%, there may be heavy, but it depends on the tax collecting flowers to where to go.

fact, many people did not notice that the Forbes list What is the purpose. For example some people say that with the maximum tax rate added to the irrational, he does not know for what, in fact, added together provide a business environment, more is to give investors, the rich people to look at, not to the general point of view of. Forbes put the highest tax rate for each together, such as personal income tax, add up to 45%, but most people are not 45%.

future tax reform is tax reduction target?

favor

Dynasty before: I agree that ?the future of tax reform, tax reduction is the goal,? the statement. Some of our current tax rate is too high, such as value-added tax, business tax, etc., may be appropriate to lower the tax rate, while value-added tax to broaden the scope, strengthening tax collection, reduce tax rates to make up the losses back.

Liu Huan: I agree with this. Because the tax is a step to improve the economy. Production, the development of many internal and external factors. Internal factors include the level of the management team, costing the rigor, etc., but the external cost accounting, the state?s macro tax system, the environment and condition for the development of the necessary factors of production. My understanding is that invigorate the economy, the core is to invigorate enterprises. Medium and small enterprises in China now there are varying degrees of difficulty, especially SMEs, is currently facing many operational difficulties, such as financing, market environment, etc., require the government to create a favorable macro conditions. Therefore, in order to improve business, tax cuts are ?1025? period of the main content.

Fu Guangming: tax cuts are an important part of tax reform should be to develop this. For businesses, the current VAT tax is heavy, it should reduce it. In addition, the implicit tax in rural areas is still relatively heavy, the nominal and actual tax revenue is still a gap, and therefore, the state should reduce people?s taxes. China?s tax system and in the West, the West is mainly income tax, turnover tax in China is the main problem is not only tax cuts, but also reform the tax system. China?s prosperity slowly after the turnover tax to the income tax to the direction of change, more equitable income tax number, tax evasion is less.

opponents

EQUAL: tax cut is certainly not the goal of tax reform, tax reform goal is to make the tax system more perfect. Can be said that the future tax cuts along with tax reform measures, but can not be said to be the target.

measures to reduce taxes on the premise that income should reach a certain level. Fiscal years of rapid growth, give tax cuts to provide a certain amount of space. But I think what little mention of structural tax cuts, these terms are ambiguous.

our tax structure is reasonable?

unreasonable

dynasty was: unreasonable, and should direct the appropriate tax rate increase a little, so the role will be larger. It now appears that an increasing proportion of low direct taxes, low personal income tax, inheritance tax, property tax is difficult to introduce, and these taxes can not have progress in the near future. VAT and indirect taxes, sales tax and there fight the problem. Services in the heavy tax burden on business tax, value-added tax is also over weight.

EQUAL: there must be unreasonable, for example, is now VAT, indirect taxes, the proportion of relatively large, bring a range of issues. Had said that developing countries should be mainly indirect, and now economic globalization, it was found not right. Therefore proposed to raise the proportion of direct taxes, reducing the proportion of indirect taxes.

reasonable

Fu Guangming: basically sound. Because we are in developing countries, wealth is not accumulated to a certain extent, our tax system can not fully engage in the West that now. China?s income tax and turnover tax co-exist, there must be a transition. On the other hand, to open by some new tax, such as real estate tax. In the West, you buy two houses, second houses should pay taxes.

and unreasonable that no reasonable

Liu Huan: What is reasonable is not the problem. The world?s tax structure, there are three, some turnover tax, such as China, France; some with income-based, like the United Kingdom, United States, Japan; and some value-added tax, income tax, turnover tax both. Therefore, because of the tax system is reasonable to state, due to different times and different, can not say what kind of structure is like, what kind of bad.

in China, within a very long time, I judge, the major share of turnover tax position. Income countries mainly because of many conditions, such as accounting standards high, taxpayer?s habits, in the business accounts of enterprises with high accuracy, a strong sense of civic tax, etc., do not have these thing if we income tax can not be achieved in the core of the system. Therefore, the turnover tax to the core of China?s tax system will be long.

the role of taxation in regulating how much the gap between rich and poor?

can adjust the gap

Dynasty before: we want more emphasis on the income tax function, through the tax to the people the government to provide public services, which is the most important functions. There are some tax adjustment function, but it can not value, such as the personal income tax all of a sudden we can not increase tax rates on the world so high, an increase the rich are gone, so the adjustment function is affected by a number of restrictions. As some policy, such as energy, science and technology we can do it, but large areas of tax regulation we do not advocate.

Liu Huan: Our basic purpose of a tax reform is through financial, taxation and other government?s macro-control means to regulate the income differentials. Income differences in regulation, in general, there is a distribution system; on tax, financial terms, fiscal instruments can be through financial subsidies, transfer payments to the lowest income groups by direct subsidies. Means other than the tax on financial terms, you can use the so-called ?load shifting? approach.

?clipping? is the highest level of income through taxes take back the state finance in the redistribution of specific performance is to cancel the 40% tax rate, 8 million over the past 40%, 10 million yuan 45%, 8 million yuan after tax reform is all 45%, so under the new system, a small number of high income people, the tax burden increased.

?valley filling? is through tax reform, tax reform will be a threshold, from 2,000 yuan to 3,500 yuan, so the crowd began to increase tax-free. Comparison of old and new tax law on our calculations, if your monthly income is 38,600 yuan, the tax burden under the tax system of old and new, are 7775 dollars; if your income is less than 38,600 yuan per month, tax will be reduced, if more than 38,600 yuan, the tax burden will increase. This rate has changed much, in my country, the monthly income of 38,600 yuan, after all, a few, so few tax increases, most people?s tax burden is reduced.

can not adjust the gap

EQUAL: the gap between rich and poor than by the so-called taxes like personal income tax adjustment can be resolved. Personal income tax can be little room for adjustment. Of course, the rich can be adjusted, but the problem is that many tax the rich you have not received one point, such as those of coal bosses, the oil bosses are cash transactions. To play a regulatory role of taxation, we must recognize its limitations, not one that you talked about tax adjustment.

Fu Guangming: At present, with the tax collection lags far behind Western countries, there are significant loopholes in regulating the function so it is also limited, difficult.

Furthermore, the tax burden on the rich control, collection and management is not tight. Therefore, simply relying on taxes to adjust the income gap is not very good, can not rely on taxes to adjust to rely on financial and other means to control.

Source: http://www.cnkeyword.info/in-low-income-people-and-smes-are-most-unreasonable-accused-of-tax/

wesley sneijder land rover defender land rover defender csm csm the walking dead season 2 spurs